Red Teaming

See how a real attacker would move through your environment — and whether your team can stop them in time.

Red Teaming that focuses on real attack paths, not checkbox exercises

Red teaming goes beyond a normal penetration test. Instead of just looking for isolated vulnerabilities, we simulate a determined attacker with realistic goals: stealing data, taking over critical systems, or compromising key identities.

The point isn’t to “win” as the attacker. It’s to give you an honest picture of how an intrusion would actually play out in your environment — and what your defenders see (or quietly miss) along the way.

How a typical red team engagement works

1Planning
2Initial access
3Lateral movement
4Readout
  1. 1. Planning & rules of engagement

    We align on objectives, constraints, and success criteria. You decide what is in-bounds, what’s off-limits, and who should (or shouldn’t) know the exercise is happening.

  2. 2. Reconnaissance & initial access

    Using OSINT, phishing, identity abuse, and misconfigurations, we obtain a foothold that a realistic attacker would have, without unnecessary disruption to production systems.

  3. 3. Lateral movement & privilege escalation

    From that foothold, we carefully move toward agreed objectives, documenting each step, decision, and missed detection opportunity as we go.

  4. 4. Readout & remediation planning

    We walk your stakeholders and defenders through what happened, what was detected (and when), and where to focus in the next 30/60/90 days for the highest impact.

Why teams book Red Teaming with us

Realistic attack paths icon

Realistic attack paths

Understand how an attacker would actually chain weaknesses together in your environment instead of looking at issues in isolation.

Detection & response under pressure icon

Detection & response under pressure

See how your SOC or blue team performs when they don’t know exactly what’s coming, or when, or from where.

Actionable, prioritized outcomes icon

Actionable, prioritized outcomes

Walk away with a concrete, ordered list of improvements instead of vague “best practices” and boilerplate findings.

Frequently Asked Questions